
Mercedes' stranglehold on the 2026 Formula 1 season is becoming increasingly difficult to explain away — and according to respected F1 journalist Michael Schmidt, part of the blame lies with Audi and Porsche.
The Silver Arrows have won all five Grands Prix so far in 2026, plus two of three Sprints. Even in Miami, where they were beaten on a Saturday, it was Lando Norris in a customer McLaren that denied them — not a rival manufacturer. Mercedes have accumulated nearly as many podiums (seven) as the rest of the grid combined (eight), and lead Ferrari by a commanding 72 points in the constructors' standings.

In a Q&A with Auto Motor und Sport, Schmidt argued that Mercedes "wouldn't have the advantage they have now" if it weren't for the regulatory demands made by Audi and Porsche during the 2026 rule-writing process.
Audi officially entered Formula 1 in 2026 after acquiring Sauber, but their intentions were announced in the summer of 2022 — giving them a voice at the table when the technical regulations were being drafted. Porsche, meanwhile, held talks with Red Bull before those negotiations collapsed, with the team ultimately launching its own Powertrains division in partnership with Ford.

Both manufacturers reportedly insisted on two key limitations: a boost cap on the batteries, and a lower fuel compression ratio limit for the internal combustion engine. As a result, the compression ratio ceiling was reduced from 18:1 to 16:1.
What neither party anticipated was that Mercedes would find a way around it.
The FIA's original compliance tests were conducted only at ambient temperature. This meant that if an engine reached a higher compression ratio once warmed up on track, it would not be detected. Mercedes are believed to have exploited this gap, pushing closer to the old 18:1 limit under race conditions — a trick that is estimated to have yielded as much as 13 additional horsepower, though the team insists the real-world benefit is considerably smaller. Crucially, Mercedes also received assurances from the FIA that their approach was within the rules.
The implications for rivals — particularly Ferrari — have been significant. The Scuderia are reportedly running 20 horsepower or more behind Mercedes, with the compression ratio loophole potentially accounting for roughly half of that deficit. The widely held view in the paddock is that Ferrari have built the best chassis on the grid in 2026, yet have been unable to convert that advantage into race victories due to their power unit shortfall. As Lewis Hamilton has noted ahead of Monaco, the power gap remains an urgent concern that must be addressed.
From the Monaco Grand Prix onwards, the FIA has moved to close the loophole by requiring engine compliance tests to be conducted at 130 degrees Celsius — a temperature far more representative of real-world running conditions. The Monaco GP is thus the first race held under the revised regulations, and the impact on the competitive order — or the lack of any meaningful shift — will be one of the most closely watched developments of the European season.
Schmidt is careful to note that Audi and Porsche could not have foreseen the consequences of their demands. But the irony is striking: in attempting to level the playing field through stricter limits, they may have inadvertently handed Mercedes precisely the kind of grey area in which they have historically excelled.

He’s a software engineer with a deep passion for Formula 1 and motorsport. He co-founded Formula Live Pulse to make live telemetry and race insights accessible, visual, and easy to follow.
Comments (0)
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!
Loading posts...