

The 2026 Formula 1 season has barely begun, yet the sport's newest regulatory framework is already under intense scrutiny. Following the inaugural on-track activities of the season, the driver community has demonstrated sharply divided opinions on the new machinery. While Lando Norris and George Russell have embraced the fresh regulations with optimistic assessments, a larger contingent led by Max Verstappen, Fernando Alonso, and Lewis Hamilton has voiced substantive criticisms.
"Drivers supporting the changes could fit into a small 'easy-up tent,'" Verstappen remarked, contrasting them with a considerably larger group harboring reservations. Even Norris subsequently acknowledged that despite his initial positivity, the new cars do not represent "the truest representation of racing."

Rather than dismiss these concerns, the FIA has signaled a willingness to recalibrate. Nikolas Tombazis, the FIA's single-seater director, emphasized that while the new regulations are "generally satisfactory," the governing body remains receptive to driver feedback.
"The cars are new," Tombazis noted, acknowledging that simulator work during late 2025 had generated substantial concerns, though comments from the Bahrain test proved "certainly more favorable."
The crucial caveat: the FIA is adamant about avoiding an overreaction. F1 CEO Stefano Domenicali urged the sport to "stay calm" and resist panic, emphasizing that new regulations naturally invite uncertainty. The governing body wants to wait until after the opening races before proposing specific modifications, though preliminary refinements were already agreed upon at the F1 Commission meeting on February 18.

Energy deployment has emerged as the primary pain point. Drivers have expressed concerns about being "energy poor" on straights, limiting overtaking opportunities and constraining the racing spectacle.
The FIA is exploring potential adjustments to permit greater energy recovery per lap, which would consequently allow more energy deployment during race scenarios. Tombazis revealed that these modifications would primarily involve software adjustments rather than hardware changes—refinements to how power units operate rather than fundamental system alterations. This approach minimizes disruption while addressing core complaints about the current energy balance.

The critical question remains: how rapidly could adjustments materialize? Tombazis provided a measured timeline: changes are "unlikely" between Australia and China, but implementation would not stretch "months and months." The FIA must navigate governance processes while conducting genuine on-track assessments during competitive racing—a dynamic significantly different from testing conditions.
Tombazis emphasized that approximately 90% of the regulatory framework already functions satisfactorily, positioning potential adjustments as refinements rather than comprehensive overhauls. The FIA's five-year perspective acknowledges this inaugural season as merely the beginning of F1's hybrid-focused journey.
The verdict remains forthcoming, but the FIA's openness to dialogue suggests the sport's governing body is determined to protect competitive racing while remaining faithful to its sustainability objectives.

He’s a software engineer with a deep passion for Formula 1 and motorsport. He co-founded Formula Live Pulse to make live telemetry and race insights accessible, visual, and easy to follow.
Want to add a comment? Download our app to join the conversation!
Comments
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!